Trading Technology

05:25 PM
Connect Directly
Facebook
Google+
Twitter
RSS
E-Mail
50%
50%

Columbia University Professor Analyzes HFT

Based on what it calls 'the first meta-analysis of HFT,' Columbia Business School Professor Charles Jones finds that high frequency trading benefits liquidity and lowers trading costs, echoing other academic studies.

A study of high frequency trading by a Columbia Business School professor released earlier this week concluded that HFT-related strategies are “making markets better, not destabilizing them.”

The study, conducted by Professor Charles Jones, who is the Robert W. Lear Professor of Finance and Economics at Columbia’s Business School, is not based on reviewing existing research. The study is termed the “first meta-analysis on HFT” in that it surveyed approximately 30 theoretical and empirical papers on the topic.

The core findings, which echo previous academic studies, are that HFT enhances market liquidity, reduces trading costs and makes stock, prices more efficient. “Better liquidity lowers the cost of capital for firms, which is an important positive for the real economy,” the study states. It also points out that the lower cost of automation can be passed onto investor in the form of narrower bid-asked spreads and commissions.

However, the research was funded by a grant from Citadel, LLC, one of the largest high frequency trading firms, which would be impacted by an regulatory actions to curb or tax HFT.

“At a time when HFT has become a subject of regulatory focus, it is important that policymakers, practitioners, and researchers dispassionately assess the hard data of accumulated evidence on HFT’s impacts,” stated Jones in the press release summarizing the findings of his analysis.

The study looks at HFT as a style of trading in which firms typically trade hundreds or thousands of times per day for their own account, with a typical holding period measured in seconds or minutes. It also defines HFT as a subset of all-algorithmic trading, which is generally defined as the use of a computer algorithm to make decisions about order submissions and cancellations.

In response to commentators who have argued that HFT could make markets more fragile, leading to the possibility of extreme market moves and episodes of extreme illiquidity, the study analyzes the May 6, 2010 Flash Crash. It notes that the CFTC and SEC identified many HFT firms during the Flash Crash and found they initially stabilized prices abut were eventually overwhelmed and in liquidating their positions, exacerbated the downturn. Professor Jones notes this is a common response by intermediaries that also occurred in less automated times such as the October 1987 market crash and a similar market crash in 1962. The study notes that short term individual stock price limits and trading halts which have been introduced since the Flash Crash, and appear to be a “well crafted regulatory measure that should prevent a recurrence.”

[HFT: A Clear and Present Danger?]

Acknowledging that regulators in the US and abroad are considering a number of regulatory initiatives, the study weighs the pros and cons of these potential measures. Specifically, it considers consolidated order-level audit trails and admits that with HFT, “malfeasance is possible in order submission strategies, so regulators need ready access to order level data from multiple venues.” With respect to order cancellation or excess message fees, it notes that Nasdaq is currently imposing these fees in the U.S, but it is too soon to measure the effects. The study warns that “order cancellation fees will almost certainly reduce liquidity provision away from the inside quote, reducing depth.” It recommends that current initiatives should be studied carefully before broader message-based fees are considered. In addition, the study also advises against proposals for minimum order exposure times, where orders could not be cancelled for 50 milliseconds. It also advises against securities transaction taxes, which it warns will have dire consequences such as increasing volatility, worsening liquidity, increasing trading costs and causing trading to move offshore.

Ivy is Editor-at-Large for Advanced Trading and Wall Street & Technology. Ivy is responsible for writing in-depth feature articles, daily blogs and news articles with a focus on automated trading in the capital markets. As an industry expert, Ivy has reported on a myriad ... View Full Bio

Comment  | 
Print  | 
More Insights
Comments
Newest First  |  Oldest First  |  Threaded View
KR Reed
50%
50%
KR Reed,
User Rank: Apprentice
4/11/2013 | 7:35:33 PM
re: Columbia University Professor Analyzes HFT
Ivy is doing an amazing job of covering the most unfair practice in the financial world today. HFT's always warn against any potential rule change that could threaten their free reign. There is no transparency in their world, except that their wealth and power are consuming the world's riches at an alarming rate. An "unnamed" HFT was interviewed recently on CNBC. The question was posed, "What benefit does the HFT provide?" The only answer he could provide was "liquidity". Liquidity was never an issue before HFT. Perhaps it is liquidity for the HFT, the rest of us do not mind waiting an extra second or two for our trade to be confirmed. I am concerned that by the time the world's leaders realize that HFT is not about growth, but unconstrained greed that shifts tax load to the middle class at the expense of all of us, it will be too late. The stock market could be at record levels today but they could pull it down tomorrow 20% in a few hours, yet they would close that terrible day with gains.
Register for Wall Street & Technology Newsletters
White Papers
Current Issue
Wall Street & Technology - Elite 8, October 2014
The in-depth profiles of this year's Elite 8 honorees focus on leadership, talent recruitment, big data, analytics, mobile, and more.
Video
Exclusive: Inside the GETCO Execution Services Trading Floor
Exclusive: Inside the GETCO Execution Services Trading Floor
Advanced Trading takes you on an exclusive tour of the New York trading floor of GETCO Execution Services, the solutions arm of GETCO.