Risk Management

01:45 PM
Melanie Rodier
Melanie Rodier
Commentary
Connect Directly
Facebook
Google+
LinkedIn
Twitter
RSS
E-Mail
50%
50%

Will New Regulation Mark the End of HFT in Europe?

Germany and other EU countries are aiming to push through legislation that will rein in high-frequency trading. But are they looking at the right issue?

Germany is set to approve a new bill this week that aims to rein in high-frequency trading and the risk associated with the practice. The move has financial industry observers already fearing that it could open up a path for tougher rules across Europe that could seriously hamper the growth of high frequency trading in the old continent.

Up to 40% of trading sales in Germany are currently driven by high frequency trading, the German finance minister says. While high frequency trading has taken off to an even greater extent in other European countries – in the UK for example, it accounts for 77 percent of transactions according to a 2011 Tabb Group report – Germany will be one of the first EU countries to move on the issue, the Wall Street Journal notes .

Still, the UK is also considering legislation, France and Belgium have been pushing high-frequency legislation too, and Germany hopes its bill will put pressure on other European governments to support EU-wide regulation on high-frequency trading, according to the WSJ.

So what will happen if the German legislation on HFT goes into effect? According to the WSJ, excessive use of trading systems would come with added fees and traders would have to keep a balance between orders and executed transactions. New rules would also introduce a minimum amount that prices can change on each transaction, which could in turn increase costs for traders.

Of course, the high frequency debate continues to rage in the U.S. too. Detractors are concerned about the increasing number of incidents, such as the 2010 Flash Crash and the Knight Capital debacle last month that have been set off by high frequency trading, have caused chaos in financial markets, and have seriously damaged investor confidence.

But high-frequency trading supporters say regulation would harm the market by preventing traders from reacting quickly to market shifts and managing risk.

From the WSJ:

Imposing caps on the number of trades or instituting order-to-trade ratios, as proposed in the bill, could restrict traders from being able to revise their quotes, the price at which they buy or sell stocks, based on new information, they say. Installing a minimum price change can lead to larger market spreads, which equals higher costs for traders.

"We think a one-size-fits-all approach would be very harmful. These order-to-trade ratios could be harmful if not set on the right level," said Remco Lenterman, chairman of the FIA European Principal Traders Association, which represents firms that trade their own capital in the exchange-traded markets. Mr. Lenterman did praise Germany for allowing exchanges to play a strong role in regulating the market, adding that "our goal is to make sure the markets are not disrupted."

Perhaps most importantly, experts suggest the issue at stake isn't high-frequency trading itself and the need for the practice to be regulated, but the fact that firms are failing at their core competencies – such as when Knight Capital glaringly failed to test its software leading to its August 1 market disaster.

As such, regulators should ensure adequate controls and tests on the part of market participants, rather than trying to put a stop to high-frequency trading itself, experts argue.

On October 2, the SEC will be holding a market technology roundtable to discuss how market participants can prevent and respond to technology errors in real-time. After the roundtable, Wall Street & Technology and Advanced Trading will hold a live video webcast with industry experts to analyze the various points of view raised during the SEC’s discussion. Join us for the webcast, and let us know your thoughts on the issue.

Melanie Rodier has worked as a print and broadcast journalist for over 10 years, covering business and finance, general news, and film trade news. Prior to joining Wall Street & Technology in April 2007, Melanie lived in Paris, where she worked for the International Herald ... View Full Bio
Comment  | 
Print  | 
More Insights
More Commentary
Moving the Trader Closer to the Investment Process
The sell side can demonstrate more value by applying analytics to pre- and post-trading, and by educating buy-side clients about broker segmentation, trading behavior and algorithm shortcomings, and more.
Wirehouses May See More Independent BDs as Retention Packages Expire
Retention bonuses are expiring, leaving brokerages vulnerable to attrition. Is access to technology making it easier for brokers to go independent?
SCI: A Whale of a Regulation
The SEC's Reg SCI weights in at a whopping 742 pages. Here is what you need to know about the oversized regulation.
One Size Fits Nobody in End User Services
How building profiles from employees' roles and behaviors can help optimize your end user services.
'Enlightened' Non-IT Execs More Likely To Run Secure Organization
Do senior executives understand their role in data security? On the whole, unsurprisingly, no.
Register for Wall Street & Technology Newsletters
White Papers
Current Issue
Wall Street & Technology - Elite 8, October 2014
The in-depth profiles of this year's Elite 8 honorees focus on leadership, talent recruitment, big data, analytics, mobile, and more.
Video
Inside Abel Noser's Trading Floor
Inside Abel Noser's Trading Floor
Advanced Trading takes you on an exclusive tour of Abel Noser's New York trading floor, where the agency broker known for transaction cost analysis, is customizing algorithms for the buy side, while growing its fixed income trading and transitions business.