Risk Management

10:00 AM
David Craig
David Craig
Connect Directly

The Conversation: Connecting the Global Regulatory Agenda

US and European regulatory practices have diverged in crucial areas such as banking oversight, derivatives regulation, and privacy protection. Reforms are moving ahead but gaps persist. Should there be more cooperation?

In this Q&A, Sharon Bowles, the retiring MEP and chair of the Economic and Monetary Affairs Committee for the European Parliament, and David Craig, President, Financial & Risk, Thomson Reuters. exchange views on global regulation of the financial system.

Sharon Bowles, retiring MEP, Chair, Economic and Monetary Affairs Committee, European Parliament
Sharon Bowles, retiring MEP, Chair, Economic and Monetary Affairs Committee, European Parliament

The financial crisis demonstrated that cooperation on regulation and oversight of the global financial system has never been more important. Regulatory divergence is not only economically costly; it encourages regulatory arbitrage and can also introduce duplicative or inefficient practices for both providers and users of capital, thereby undermining global economic growth.

David Craig: Whilst American and European regulatory practices have diverged in several crucial areas – banking oversight, derivatives regulation and privacy protection – they have otherwise been to date remarkably consistent. Reforms are moving ahead, but gaps continue to arise which can undermine both efficiency and stability. Where do you see leadership on these issues coming from?

Sharon Bowles: (That is) the million dollar question. Many want to see international regulatory bodies playing the leading role. On the one hand there is a strong case for this, and they have to have a big role, but it leaves a democratic deficit and is not proven to escape ‘group think’. At the moment the FSB and Basle are also dominated by central banks. These central banks did not themselves escape group think before the financial crisis, nor do they have the full range of expertise and understanding on the markets, insurance and fund management side of things.

I think the answer is that the combination of G20 and international regulatory bodies is the best that we have got, but those clubs at the moment are too exclusive, and that at least in the EU there has to be earlier involvement of the political level.

Craig: The US and the EU are clearly leading players in the G20 and in global regulatory bodies like the FSB in Basle. They seem to have delivered a very similar set of new rules, with the G20, notably on derivatives and on banking capital. Yet we hear a lot from industry that the rules, despite appearances, do differ and on occasion conflict with each other. From your perspective in the European Parliament, how well have the two sides cooperated? Do they deliver convergent outcomes?

Bowles: My experience has been that rules come out as if there were some generic financial system and this is not the case. EU applies Basle to all its banks, not just the big ones, so there have to be inbuilt provisions for proportionality. Maybe moving forward, if there is not a whole tsunami of legislation to deal with, there might be opportunity for greater parliamentary scrutiny before getting to the final stages because otherwise there will continue to be changes made at later stages.I think the US and EU have cooperated well although from my side it often looks as if the US regards cooperation as doing what it wants and expecting the EU to agree. Dialogue is important and we have got to get to a place that is a great deal better, by which I mean convergent, than it could have been.

David Craig is President, Financial and Risk, at Thomson Reuters Corp. David joined the company in 2007, serving first as Chief Strategy Officer. He subsequently became founder and President of its Governance, Risk, and Compliance business. Previously, he was with McKinsey & ... View Full Bio
1 of 2
Comment  | 
Print  | 
More Insights
Threaded  |  Newest First  |  Oldest First
User Rank: Author
5/23/2014 | 12:22:04 PM
Small vs. Big institutions
I'm happy that you mentioend that issue of proportionality. It's a big issue here in the states where we have such a big community banking sector that struggles to match the same compliance requirements that big banks have to deal with. I think it's interesting that some industry associations are helping community banks to pool resources to help with compliance. I expect that trend will continue to grow as there isn't enough consideration in regulations today around the size of institutions.
More Commentary
A Wild Ride Comes to an End
Covering the financial services technology space for the past 15 years has been a thrilling ride with many ups as downs.
The End of an Era: Farewell to an Icon
After more than two decades of writing for Wall Street & Technology, I am leaving the media brand. It's time to reflect on our mutual history and the road ahead.
Beyond Bitcoin: Why Counterparty Has Won Support From Overstock's Chairman
The combined excitement over the currency and the Blockchain has kept the market capitalization above $4 billion for more than a year. This has attracted both imitators and innovators.
Asset Managers Set Sights on Defragmenting Back-Office Data
Defragmenting back-office data and technology will be a top focus for asset managers in 2015.
4 Mobile Security Predictions for 2015
As we look ahead, mobility is the perfect breeding ground for attacks in 2015.
Register for Wall Street & Technology Newsletters
White Papers
Current Issue
Wall Street & Technology - Elite 8, October 2014
The in-depth profiles of this year's Elite 8 honorees focus on leadership, talent recruitment, big data, analytics, mobile, and more.
Inside Abel Noser's Trading Floor
Inside Abel Noser's Trading Floor
Advanced Trading takes you on an exclusive tour of Abel Noser's New York trading floor, where the agency broker known for transaction cost analysis, is customizing algorithms for the buy side, while growing its fixed income trading and transitions business.