The quiet ‘executive compensation’ revolution which recently came to be known as the ‘Shareholders’ Spring’ is starting to show some timid results.
JP Morgan and Citigroup are two of the latest banks that are now re-thinking their top executives’ pay practices, according to an article in the Wall Street Journal.
JP Morgan chief executive Jamie Dimon, who has been in the news for all the wrong reasons in the last few months, could (and should) take a personal hit, given his bank’s $7 billion trading snafu.
After all, the bank’s boss should ultimately be held responsible for his employees’ errors, particularly if they are as protracted as the London Whale’s massive bets and lax risk management practices, right?
Well, not so fast. According to the Journal, JP Morgan’s directors are “considering” lower 2012 bonuses for Dimon and other top executives at the bank. Rather disappointingly, they also are grappling with the question of how to do that without drastically reducing the executives' take-home pay,” the paper quoted sources as saying.
Of course, it is not just the multibillion dollar trading mistake that is causing JP Morgan to take another look at executive pay. Weaker financial industry performance, sluggish economic growth and broad cost-cutting are also affecting revenue.
Recently, Deutsche Bank’s co-CEO Anshu Jain said the bank was looking to change its ethics policy and compensation practices to meet the stricter expectations of regulators, government and the public. He noted that the bank would "make sure that the tone at the top is crystal clear."
This year, UBS also reduced its bonus pool for 2011 by 40 percent to $2.8 billion, due to sliding profits. The total bonus handed out to its investment bankers was 60 percent lower than for 2010, according to reports.
Meanwhile, earlier this year, in what has been named the ‘Shareholders’ Spring’, 37% of shareholder votes at UBS were cast against the Swiss bank’s pay proposals, while 54% voted against life insurer Aviva’s compensation policies.
In April, Citigroup shareholders rejected a board-approved compensation package for chief executive Vikram S. Pandit which boosted his pay to $14.9 million from $1 the previous year. Some 55 percent of votes went against the package.
While shareholders would like to see the bonuses of Wall Street executives be more commensurate with banks’ results, a high-profile trading disaster like the one that befell JP Morgan is even more reason to reduce bonuses in the eyes of most investors.
However, JP Morgan doesn’t want to rock the boat too much. The Times notes that some inside the bank “don't want to be seen as overreacting to what the company views as a one-time event.”
From the WSJ:
Some executives argued that a series of management changes made in late July should have been delayed so that the moves wouldn't be perceived as a reaction to the trading losses, said people close to the bank. But Mr. Dimon said the announcement should be made as planned, these people added.
Ultimately, if a $7 billion trading mistake isn’t enough to humble a chief executive into taking a pay cut, it is hard to see how executive compensation practices will change in the near future. At the very least, it looks like it will take a wider sweeping ‘Shareholder Spring’ - or more swiveling of the regulatory hammer.