Exchanges

02:47 PM
Joe Saluzzi
Joe Saluzzi
Commentary
Connect Directly
Twitter
RSS
E-Mail
50%
50%

Follow The Money

Fragmentation, complex trading rules, rebate arbitrage and opaque venues are just a few of the reasons why the market is unnecessarily complex.

Follow the money. If you want to know why the US equity market is overly and unnecessarily complex, just follow the money. And if you want to know why "glitches" will continue to happen, then just follow the money.

One of the main reasons for the complexity is the number of exchanges. There are 13 exchanges each with their own rules, their own fee schedules, their own order types, their own data feeds, their own colocation facilities and their own profit goals. These exchanges all need to feed their quote and trade information to the SIP. Based on press reports, it's becoming apparent that the SIP got overloaded last week and that was the reason for the 3 hour market halt. With all 13 exchanges pumping in millions and millions of quotes per day, and with the SIP apparently having no backup, it was only a matter of time before they overloaded the system.

While the fragmentation of the equity market has created an enormous technical strain, it has also created an economic windfall for exchanges when it comes to selling market data services. While it is common knowledge that exchanges sell colocation space and data feeds, it is not common knowledge that they also collect millions of dollars per year in market data revenue. Last year, a paper written by a Federal Reserve researcher titled "Equity Trading and the Allocation of Market Data Revenue" investigated the market data revenue that exchanges have been collecting. They found:

"Data revenue constitutes an important source of income for securities exchanges. For example, sales of consolidated equity market data in the United States generated approximately $400 Million in 2004, representing about 10–15% of total revenues reported by the largest exchanges, and substantially more for some of the smaller exchanges. By 2008, consolidated data sales revenue had increased to approximately $450 Million."

Starting to see the picture now? Exchanges have fragmented so they can generate sales from new data feeds and colocation centers and also collect a larger percentage of the market data revenue pot. But while this has been going on for the last few years (with SEC approval), exchanges failed to spend enough money on the infrastructure that links them all together.

What happens now? How do we prevent another overload from happening? Most likely regulators will gather the heads of the industry and decide to throw more money and more complexity at the problem. There will be roundtables and white papers. There will be no shortage of new, complex answers to the complex problems (again, follow the money). This is not the answer. The answer lies in simplicity, not complexity.

We recommend the following:

1) Consolidation: The SEC should require consolidation of the 13 stock exchanges (Based on press reports of a BATS/Direct Edge merger, this is already happening). Consolidating the exchanges will lead to deeper pools of liquidity and a healthier price discovery process. Consolidating the exchanges will also dramatically reduce quotes and reduce the stress on the system. We can envision having three exchanges: NYSE, NASDAQ and BATS/EDGE. Having three exchanges will ensure redundancy and will also still foster competition.

2) Trade-At Rule: The SEC should implement a trade-at rule which would require a minimum price improvement increment (we recommend one penny or half the spread in penny spread stocks) before dark pools could trade ahead of a displayed quote. This trade at rule should move significant volumes back to the remaining exchanges and help build deeper, more robust liquidity pools.

3) Disclosure: Dark pools are a significant portion of today's volume yet have very little disclosure. The SEC should mandate that dark pools disclose their volume, largest participants, routing logic and order types. Once investors know more about where their order flow is directed, then they will be able to make more informed choices.

4) No More Rebates Eliminate rebates at all levels. No more payment for order flow. This should end the unnecessary rebate arbitrage games.

Rather than throwing more money and complexity at the problem, let's address it in a simpler more straight forward way and let the market solve the complexity issue.

Joseph Saluzzi is partner, co-founder and co-head of equity trading of Themis Trading LLC, a leading independent agency brokerage firm that trades equities for institutional money managers and hedge funds. He is also the co-author of Broken Markets -- How High Frequency ... View Full Bio
Comment  | 
Print  | 
More Insights
Comments
Newest First  |  Oldest First  |  Threaded View
IvySchmerken
50%
50%
IvySchmerken,
User Rank: Author
9/30/2013 | 11:27:53 PM
re: Follow The Money
True. Banning rebates would change the game, and reduce excessive quoting. HFT strategies would need to change if that were the case. But this is part of a larger market structure debate.
Greg MacSweeney
50%
50%
Greg MacSweeney,
User Rank: Apprentice
9/30/2013 | 3:59:27 PM
re: Follow The Money
Some argue that the entire idea of offering 'incentives' to trade is creating false markets. The liquidity isn't real and can vanish in an instant.
IvySchmerken
50%
50%
IvySchmerken,
User Rank: Author
9/30/2013 | 3:21:09 PM
re: Follow The Money
Greg is on the money! Exchanges are turning to market data to make up the short fall in transaction fees due to lower volumes. As for rebates, they are baked into the smart order routing tables for HFT firms and electronic market makers. If rebates are banned, will some other incentive arise to take its place?
Greg MacSweeney
50%
50%
Greg MacSweeney,
User Rank: Apprentice
9/29/2013 | 1:01:58 AM
re: Follow The Money
Agreed. Excessive rebates...and complete businesses designed around maximizing rebates ... is creating a lot of ripples in the market. Exchanges are looking to maximize market data fees and are actively auditing and trying to find ways to get more revenue out of their market data businesses. This is happening at the expense of market participants.
More Commentary
5 Tips to Save the Wall Street Datacenter
Though cloud computing and SaaS are all the rage, there is still a need for proprietary Wall Street datacenters, as long as they are run efficiently.
Preventive Measures for Post-Interview Anxiety
Most professionals leave interviews thinking that it went well, and then they wait... and wait. The Caring Recruiter has a cure for the typical post-interview trauma.
Leaving Out the Welcome Mat for Financial Services Hackers
Everyone knows the financial services industry is a prime target for hackers. Despite the dangers, many applications have software vulnerabilities that expose real risks.
4 Surprising Ways Firms Think About Data Security Costs
Almost 28% of firms are willing to bear the cost of some financial losses due to cybercrime, because it's less than the cost of upgrading IT systems.
CIO + CFO Doesn’t Equal Mars Vs. Venus
From my decades of experience, CIOs and CFOs have more in common than you may think.
Register for Wall Street & Technology Newsletters
White Papers
Current Issue
Wall Street & Technology - July 2014
In addition to regular audits, the SEC will start to scrutinize the cyber-security preparedness of market participants.
Video
Exclusive: Inside the GETCO Execution Services Trading Floor
Exclusive: Inside the GETCO Execution Services Trading Floor
Advanced Trading takes you on an exclusive tour of the New York trading floor of GETCO Execution Services, the solutions arm of GETCO.