Compliance

04:48 PM
David Craig, Thomson Reuters
David Craig, Thomson Reuters
Commentary
50%
50%

What’s Next in Disruptive Technology and Innovation in Financial Services – Download from Davos

One topic debated at last week's World Economic Forum is whether the current model of capital markets, buy- and sell-side, can survive in a world where technology no longer presents the barrier it once did, writes Daniel Craig of Thomson Reuters.

Regulation and technological innovation are among the key subjects being hotly debated both on and off the official agenda at the 43rd annual World Economic Forum, which kicked off in Davos last week. These topics were especially scrutinized during the WEF’s Disruptive Innovations in Financial Services working group meeting on Thursday. This group, of which I am a member, includes a small number of senior representatives from leading banks, insurers, wealth and asset management firms and financial organizations.

David Craig, Thomson Reuters
David Craig, Thomson Reuters
As the session was under Chatham House Rule, I am prevented from revealing specific details, but there are some high level points I can – and would like to – share. One of the more interesting questions we debated is whether the current model of capital markets, buy- and sell-side, can survive in a world where technology no longer presents the barrier it once did. One of the more sobering comments came from a CEO who said he didn’t need a sell-side bank anymore because he can now go directly to the buy-side or lending markets.

Clearly the complexity, structure, and expertise mean there is still a strong role for sell-side institutions. However, technology is leveling the playing field and there is no longer room for anyone to take for granted the economic model that they enjoyed pre-2008. Sell-side institutions should be thinking about accessing the buy-side, being more comprehensive in their model and not allowing disintermediation to happen. Undoubtedly there will be disruption to the financial services supply chain as a result of these changes.

One can’t talk about market structure without mentioning how the lending and shadow banking arena has also changed in the current climate. Many in the industry are seeing lenders replace banks that are more capital constrained. In fact, there has been an impressive amount of innovation in the peer-to-peer lending arena, with many new online financial lending communities sprouting up and building successful businesses, thus raising the stakes for the established banks. It’s not surprising that insurance groups are looking at cyber business as a growing opportunity. However, as shadow banking organizations and lenders become larger, they too become regulated, and often regulation again becomes a barrier to competition.

A snap poll of the 50 plus executives in the WEF Disruptive Innovations in Financial Services working group questioned whether regulation would mean more or less competition. A resounding 80% of those polled believe that it would mean less. They believe that the rules on anti-money laundering (AML) and Know Your Customer (KYC) are halting innovation in many companies. This is why we’re focused on this area. Clearly, the industry needs to think about the unintended consequences of regulation.

Technology is changing the face of the advisory market as social media has proven that people are comfortable having conversations with someone they have never met. Business models will continue to change and technology will continue to have a key role to play. But we have to be careful as the old model of using historical data to predict the future has proven time and again to be unreliable, and even with better technology, more judgment is required.

We are now seeing a financial industry using analytics to compete and technology is lowering the cost of access to more sophisticated analytics. Today professionals can get the same computing power on their mobile phones that would have only been available on super computers a couple of decades ago. However financial institutions seem to fall into two main schools of thoughts – either that the big wallets can afford to make super decisions or that analytics are cheaper and generally more available. No doubt, time will tell.

One thing that is clear from all of the discussion and debate on disruptive innovations is that technology is changing access to capital, expertise and distribution. My advice on what to do tomorrow is clearly invest in technology and ensure your business model is ready for what’s coming next.

David Craig is president of the Financial & Risk business of Thomson Reuters, a leading provider of financial information, news, technology and regulatory solutions to the global financial community.

Comment  | 
Print  | 
More Insights
More Commentary
Shared Reporting Services on the Horizon, Genpact Predicts
The financial services industry is starting to adopt shared services, resulting in reasonable impacts to the bottom line. Genpact expects a push for reporting efficiency will come next.
Don't Let the Cloud Rain on Your Operations Strategy Parade
Avoid migrating large applications all at once to minimize risk during a cloud project.
Could Intel Lose Data Center Market Share to ARM Chips?
ARM chips could be an alternative for certain purposes in the datacenter, but many questions have to be answered before they pose a threat to Intel's market dominance.
Cost to Trade: Hey, Banks, Itís Time to Face the Music
Why is calculating the cost to trade so difficult for banks? The answer is as complex as the calculations themselves.
M&A Activity Will Continue to Grow in 2015
Data shows that the M&A market continues to improve, and forecasts indicate deal making will be healthy in 2015.
Register for Wall Street & Technology Newsletters
White Papers
Current Issue
Wall Street & Technology - Elite 8, October 2014
The in-depth profiles of this year's Elite 8 honorees focus on leadership, talent recruitment, big data, analytics, mobile, and more.
Video
Stressed Out by Compliance, Reputational Damage & Fines?
Stressed Out by Compliance, Reputational Damage & Fines?
Financial services executives are living in a "regulatory pressure cooker." Here's how executives are preparing for the new compliance requirements.