Compliance

10:45 AM
Greg MacSweeney
Greg MacSweeney
Commentary
Connect Directly
Facebook
Google+
LinkedIn
Twitter
RSS
E-Mail
50%
50%

Improving the Policing of Electronic Markets

While insider trading convictions continue to pile up, SEC chairman nominee Mary Jo White needs to focus on improving market surveillance and data analysis in order to really bolster investor confidence.

The SEC has had a pretty good run of winning convictions for insider trading cases over the past couple of years. Since 2009 the SEC has netted about 70 insider trading convictions, including Raj Rajaratnam and Rajat K. Gupta who are probably the most famous, or now infamous, recent convicts.

And the SEC isn't slowing down. Mathew Martoma, a former portfolio manager at SAC Capital, is accused of receiving insider information to make trades that made SAC Capital $276 million in profits, dwarfing the $63 million Rajaratnam made from his insider trading scheme.

However, while insider trading cases make for good publicity for the SEC -- following a time when they missed some pretty large (ok enormous) ponzi schemes (Madoff) -- investors are worried about a lot more than a few dishonest traders using insider information.

Video: Will Mary Jo White Improve Policing of Electronic Markets?

Broadly, it seems that many investors are concerned about the fragmented and fragile equities market structure in the United States. Too often have technology glitches caused wild swings or losses. These technology errors, including the 2010 Flash Crash, the Facebook IPO debacle and the scuttling of the BATS Exchange IPO, have raised serious questions about how the markets operate.

Each day, traders are reporting strange blips, hiccups and mini flash crashes in individual stocks. Many times the cause is as simple as a balky data feed, or an exchange that had a problem with a matching engine. Other times, some investors suspect algo-fueled conspiracies that flood specific stocks with orders, or other high-tech market shenanigans designed to take advantage of problems with the current market structure.

[To read more about some of the most memorable chairmen of the SEC, visit: 6 Most Memorable SEC Chiefs.]

The SEC could and should play a role when it comes to investigating the market abnormalities. At the very least, the SEC should be able to tell investors that it looked at a specific situation, reviewed the data and discovered that it was a benign faulty server, or a bad data feed. If the SEC could do that, a good deal of confidence would be restored to investors. And then, the SEC could begin to look at some of the more complex cases that might be connected to market manipulation.

However, despite good intentions, the SEC isn't yet capable of policing the electronic markets effectively. It takes days, weeks or months for the SEC to review data on simple market incidents, which alone gets investors nervous. It took the SEC over five months to issue its Flash Crash report, which was widely panned by market observers. And when traders complain or speculate about electronic market manipulation, the SEC seemingly remains quiet, allowing rumors to spread and the perception to grow that there is an un-level playing field for high-speed traders and "average" investors.

Over the next few years Mary Jo White, who will likely be the next SEC chairman, will need to help the commission revamp and upgrade it market surveillance capabilities. White has a good record as a prosecutor and the SEC will continue to crack down on insider trading and other infractions. But when investors and traders know what is happening in the markets long before the regulators do, it sets a bad tone.

White, like her predecessors, will be challenged when it comes to improving market surveillance capabilities. The SEC is playing catch up in a technological race where the other participants not only have a huge head start, but have larger budgets and a depth of knowledge about electronic trading that the SEC lacks. Many of the individual brokers IT budgets exceed the entire operating budget for the SEC.

White will need to bring in experts and newer technologies that can help monitor and analyze data very quickly. If the SEC can do this, it will help improve investor confidence much more than all of the convictions from insider trading convictions combined.

Greg MacSweeney is editorial director of InformationWeek Financial Services, whose brands include Wall Street & Technology, Bank Systems & Technology, Advanced Trading, and Insurance & Technology. View Full Bio
Comment  | 
Print  | 
More Insights
Comments
Newest First  |  Oldest First  |  Threaded View
Byurcan
50%
50%
Byurcan,
User Rank: Author
2/7/2013 | 8:01:34 PM
re: Improving the Policing of Electronic Markets
-Could one of the reasons be that insider trading cases are generally newsworthy, so the SEC gets good publicity from prosecuting the, or am I just being cynical ;)
But, more likely, it's probably just really hard to monitor and analyze every hiccup and blip, but that will probably get better as newer and better technologies are used for market surveillance.-
Ivy Schmerken
50%
50%
Ivy Schmerken,
User Rank: Apprentice
2/6/2013 | 7:41:18 PM
re: Improving the Policing of Electronic Markets
-As you said, the SEC has been very slow to investigate market abnormalities, such as mini-flash crashes and other blips that happen on a daily basis. But they seem to spend inordinate amounts of time on insider trading cases. Do you think the industry-wide project to build a new Continuous Audit Trail- (CAT) system will solve the surveillance problem?
ischmerken
50%
50%
ischmerken,
User Rank: Apprentice
2/6/2013 | 7:41:18 PM
re: Improving the Policing of Electronic Markets
-As you said, the SEC has been very slow to investigate market abnormalities, such as mini-flash crashes and other blips that happen on a daily basis. But they seem to spend inordinate amounts of time on insider trading cases. Do you think the industry-wide project to build a new Continuous Audit Trail- (CAT) system will solve the surveillance problem?
More Commentary
SEC Vote Is Drama for the Masses, With No Happily Ever After
All of them hoped it would never come to this.
Driving Information Security, From Silicon Valley to Detroit
As software interacts with more and more of our daily lives, technology providers may be liable for more damages than they have in the recent past.
Big Data's Challenge: Matching Business Needs With Technology
All those bits and bytes only add up to something when theyre organized, arranged, and made coherent.
Single Source, Many Truths
If the data quality is not at fault, why then might departments reject the data? The answer is that there are two aspects to data quality: factual correctness and contextual correctness.
Predictions Come True as Regulators Swoop
While two out of the five capital markets predictions from July have already come true, let's hope that all five don't actually happen.
Register for Wall Street & Technology Newsletters
White Papers
Current Issue
Wall Street & Technology - July 2014
In addition to regular audits, the SEC will start to scrutinize the cyber-security preparedness of market participants.
Video
Stressed Out by Compliance, Reputational Damage & Fines?
Stressed Out by Compliance, Reputational Damage & Fines?
Financial services executives are living in a "regulatory pressure cooker." Here's how executives are preparing for the new compliance requirements.