Compliance

06:43 AM
Joe Saluzzi
Joe Saluzzi
Commentary
Connect Directly
Twitter
RSS
E-Mail
50%
50%

FINRA's Dark Pool Proposal Needs A Brighter Light

The proposal on dark pools from FINRA doesn't go far enough and leaves a lot of information in the shadows.

Four years after the SEC first proposed (PDF) rules (that have still not been approved) to deal with dark pools, FINRA has now proposed (PDF) some rules of their own. FINRA is looking to add some transparency to the murky world of dark pools by proposing that alternative trading systems (ATS) start reporting some statistics.

Specifically, FINRA proposed:

"Rule 4552 to require each alternative trading system ("ATS") to report to FINRA weekly volume information and number of trades regarding securities transactions within the ATS; and (ii) amend FINRA Rules 6160, 6170, 6480, and 6720 to require each ATS to acquire and use a single, unique market participant identifier ("MPID") when reporting information to FINRA."

They stated in their filing:

"FINRA believes that the weekly volume statistics reported by each ATS will significantly enhance FINRA's ability to surveil for compliance with the requirements of Regulation ATS, and publicly disseminating the ATS trading data for equity securities will provide enhanced transparency and understanding into trading activity by ATSs in the over-the-counter market. FINRA believes that requiring each ATS to use a single, unique MPID for reporting information to FINRA will significantly enhance FINRA's ability to surveil for compliance with the requirements of Regulation ATS as well as other SEC rules, the federal securities laws, and FINRA rules."

While it's encouraging that FINRA has finally decided to require some more disclosure on dark pool trades, as usual its necessary to go beyond the headlines and look at some of the details of the proposal:

1) Non-ATS broker dealers will not have to report:

"Some firms consulted said that the information reporting requirements could place ATSs at a competitive disadvantage to broker crossing systems that are not registered as ATSs."

While off-exchange trading is currently running about 40% of overall volume, this 40% does not come exclusively from dark pools. A good percentage of it comes from internalizing brokers that are not ATS's. These internalizers will not have to report their volumes to FINRA under this new proposal.

2) FINRA will be charging a fee to access the dark pool figures:

"FINRA intends to establish a fee to recover costs that may be incurred in providing the information to professional users of the data; however, nonprofessional users could receive the data free of charge. FINRA anticipates establishing a flat, monthly subscription fee (with a yearly commitment term) for professional subscribers to access the published reports on an enterprise license basis. The entity would not be permitted to redistribute this information outside of the enterprise. In addition, FINRA is considering offering a monthly vendor enterprise license (with a yearly commitment term) to permit the redistribution of the reports."

We realize that FINRA is a non-profit organization that has expenses to cover but we hope that this doesn't turn into a revenue boom like the CTA and UTP plans have become for the exchanges.

3) Two week delay before publishing the reported data:

"FINRA discussed the proposed rule change with several of its industry committees and a number of ATS operators. The consulted firms generally supported the proposed reporting requirements and publication of the transaction information. As noted above, following discussions with firms, FINRA is proposing a two-week delay before publishing the reported data on Tier 1 NMS stocks on FINRA's web site and a four-week delay for all other NMS stocks and OTC Equity Securities."

In our opinion, FINRA's dark pool proposal barely scratches the surface of what is needed. Two week old data comprised of only a subset of off exchange trades that you need to pay for is not exactly shining a bright light on dark pools.

We would have liked to have seen FINRA ask for more disclosure on:

  • indications of interests
  • routing of orders
  • fees/rebates charged by dark pools

We also think that real time disclosure of dark pool trades should have been proposed. You may recall that the SEC proposed this back in 2009 but was then inundated with over 150 comment letters from the industry urging them not to go forward on this.

Unfortunately, we were not one of the firms that FINRA consulted with prior to issuing their dark pool proposals so our suggestions never made it into their proposal. We will, however, be commenting on the proposal and we urge all investors to do likewise.

Joseph Saluzzi is partner, co-founder and co-head of equity trading of Themis Trading LLC, a leading independent agency brokerage firm that trades equities for institutional money managers and hedge funds. He is also the co-author of Broken Markets -- How High Frequency ... View Full Bio
Comment  | 
Print  | 
More Insights
Comments
Newest First  |  Oldest First  |  Threaded View
IvySchmerken
50%
50%
IvySchmerken,
User Rank: Author
10/11/2013 | 3:21:25 PM
re: FINRA's Dark Pool Proposal Needs A Brighter Light
Exchanges want to hurt the dark pools and the internalization engines that are taking 40% of the equity volume from lit markets. Yesterday at an ICI conference, NYSE Euronext's CEO said he was willing to discuss rebates, fees, Trade AT rule and put everything on the table to improve market structure.
Greg MacSweeney
50%
50%
Greg MacSweeney,
User Rank: Apprentice
10/11/2013 | 9:55:28 AM
re: FINRA's Dark Pool Proposal Needs A Brighter Light
The MPID makes a lot of sense, but I've even heard some dark pool providers grumble that it is unnecessary, it could attract HFT to certain venues and will hurt the dark pools and so on. I guess you can't please everyone!
IvySchmerken
50%
50%
IvySchmerken,
User Rank: Author
10/11/2013 | 1:39:40 AM
re: FINRA's Dark Pool Proposal Needs A Brighter Light
I don't see how a 2-week delay before posting the dark pool volumes helps investors much. I assume professionals who pay for the feed will get it sooner. One bright spot is that FINRA is proposing unique MPID (market participant identifiers) for each dark pool, so that in hindsight traders can see which stocks are trading on which dark pools.
gogreen-traders
50%
50%
gogreen-traders,
User Rank: Apprentice
10/10/2013 | 5:02:15 PM
re: FINRA's Dark Pool Proposal Needs A Brighter Light
Incomplete data sets, fees for access to the data and a two-week delay? Do I have to pay extra for real-time quotes too, like online brokers circa 2005?
More Commentary
SEC Examinations: What to Expect When the SEC Is on Its Way
Theodore Eichenlaub highlights trends in SEC expectations and how to approach a risk assessment of your compliance program.
The Value of Predictive Analytics in Financial Services
Risk management and customer data are two key areas where data analytics is being applied in financial services.
Moving the Trader Closer to the Investment Process
The sell side can demonstrate more value by applying analytics to pre- and post-trading, and by educating buy-side clients about broker segmentation, trading behavior and algorithm shortcomings, and more.
Wirehouses May See More Independent BDs as Retention Packages Expire
Retention bonuses are expiring, leaving brokerages vulnerable to attrition. Is access to technology making it easier for brokers to go independent?
SCI: A Whale of a Regulation
The SEC's Reg SCI weights in at a whopping 742 pages. Here is what you need to know about the oversized regulation.
Register for Wall Street & Technology Newsletters
White Papers
Current Issue
Wall Street & Technology - Elite 8, October 2014
The in-depth profiles of this year's Elite 8 honorees focus on leadership, talent recruitment, big data, analytics, mobile, and more.
Video
Stressed Out by Compliance, Reputational Damage & Fines?
Stressed Out by Compliance, Reputational Damage & Fines?
Financial services executives are living in a "regulatory pressure cooker." Here's how executives are preparing for the new compliance requirements.