Asset Management

12:58 PM
Marc J. Firenze
Marc J. Firenze
Commentary
Connect Directly
LinkedIn
RSS
E-Mail
50%
50%

The Pursuit of IBOR

Achieving an accurate and consistent IBOR can be elusive for some investment management firms, writes Marc Firenze, CTO at Eagle Investment Systems.

In recent years, investment managers have increasingly looked to develop one consistent, accurate and up-to-date overview of a company’s assets across all of its businesses throughout the day. This has led to the development of the concept of an Investment Book of Record (IBOR).

Marc Firenze, Eagle Investment Systems
Marc Firenze, Eagle Investment Systems
A renewed focus on IBOR is being driven by a number of factors. Investment managers are faced with an ever-increasing amount of information to process and consolidate, from a wider range of complex instruments. This is coupled with a regulatory landscape that is shifting towards greater transparency and accountability.

The most important driver, however, comes from the need for a competitive advantage. The front-office is increasingly looking at the accuracy and timeliness of information as a way to improve the decision making process and reduce trading errors. This commercial pressure is making the development of an IBOR a priority for many firms.

In practice this can seem much more easily said than done. We recently commissioned a survey of senior executives at investment management companies and asset managers to look at their current practices around IBOR and portfolio management and were surprised to find that one in three said an IBOR was ‘out of reach’ for their organization.

A truly accurate and consistent IBOR remains elusive for so many, and as such reveals a fundamental data management issue investment managers are facing. Many firms find themselves – more through circumstance than design – with inflexible portfolio management infrastructures that hinder – or prevent entirely – the ability to have a timely and consolidated view of their assets.

Often these firms have multiple accounting and processing systems in place that have been inherited through acquisitions or built on top of their existing portfolio management system as they’ve entered new asset classes or territories. Over half of the investment firms surveyed in our study are using anywhere from two to eight systems from which to compile their IBOR. As well as making the process extremely complicated, using so many systems increases the risk of inaccurate reporting.

Factor into this that many firms outsource their middle and back office functions, leaving access to accounting information one step further removed from the front-office, and it’s easy to understand why creating an IBOR that meets the needs of the front-office can be such a challenge.

A successful IBOR delivery has enterprise data management (EDM) at its core. A data-centric approach, with a single, consolidated view of all assets with the level of detail required with data loaded directly from multiple best-of-breed systems, is the optimum way to achieve this. This single source of data helps firms make investment business decisions providing access to the underlying, granular details they need. Furthermore, because data is not being created, there is less need for reconciliation creating more accurate data available more immediately.

The IBOR is not a new concept, but it’s one that the industry has latched onto recently. The benefits are access to timely and accurate data in the decision-making process, and in this time of increased competition, mitigating the risks associated with data. In turn, this is leading firms to ask themselves searching questions about their data management practices.

—Marc Firenze is chief technology officer at Eagle Investment Systems. Firenze drives the software, technology and architecture decisions across Eagle's investment management suite.

As Chief Technology Officer of Eagle Investment Systems , Marc Firenze drives the software, technology, and architecture decisions across Eagle's investment management suite and ensures that development directly supports the firm's corporate vision. With more than 20 ... View Full Bio
Comment  | 
Print  | 
More Insights
More Commentary
What Will the Financial Back Office of Tomorrow Look Like?
Asset managers are increasingly looking to automate their manual back office workflows. Confluence calls it the "back office revolution."
Bankrolling Technical Debt: A Financierís Guide
Technical debt represents the effort required to fix source code or application problems that put the business at risk.
Staying Ahead of the Game With Continuous Delivery
The need to develop better software faster is leading financial organizations to continuous delivery (CD), a practice pioneered by SaaS companies like Salesforce.
Shore Up Cyber Security Now
Knowing that a data breach can and will happen at some point, asset management firms can manage new operational and regulatory risk with a layered approach to cyber security.
Is Big Data a Problem or an Opportunity?
When it comes to data, financial services firms are, as a rule, quite circumspect. They fear cyberattacks, data theft, data loss, security breaches, data privacy, and human error.
Register for Wall Street & Technology Newsletters
White Papers
Current Issue
Wall Street & Technology - July 2014
In addition to regular audits, the SEC will start to scrutinize the cyber-security preparedness of market participants.
Video
Top Quotes of the Week
Top Quotes of the Week
It wasn't all bad luck for the capital markets this week: Hedge funds had a decent first quarter despite a slowdown in jobs numbers, BlackRock might be heading into new territory as hedge fund managers take a hard look at their counterparties, and the head of the IMF didn't pull any punches when assessing today's global economy. At least we can admire the nice weather and some of the best quotes of the week.