Asset Management

10:40 AM
Alok Misra
Alok Misra
Commentary
50%
50%

Cloud Computing Can End CRM Torture for RIAs

RIAs have been struggling with CRM systems for decades. Is the best solution a cloud-based one?

Wealth Management is a large enough market to attract CRM providers, so why are wealth managers still struggling with CRM? Here is an excerpt from financial-planning consultant Dave Grant’s blog post:

I’ve tried to make my new RIA as heavily reliant on cloud technology as possible. Anything that I could push into a cloud technology solution I have. However, I’m still wrestling with one of my basic needs: a CRM system.

It seems Dave spent years trying various specialized CRM systems for RIAs, before implementing Salesforce, but he still doesn't have what he needs. Folks like Dave are in the business of managing people's money, not implementing CRM. They shouldn't be wrestling with anything CRM-related. If anyone should be wrestling with anything, it should be the CRM provider, not the RIA.

Sadly, that's not the case. Go to any industry blog and you’ll see plenty of stories of RIAs or independent advisors, who are sucked into becoming CRM mechanics. Cloud technology has provided more options but it hasn't yet solved the problem. RIAs keep paying CRM providers and consultants, in addition to spending their own time fixing the mess, and the torture continues.

The crux of the problem
The CRM needs of most RIAs and independent broker dealers are well understood. There may be some variations, depending on factors such as their size, focus (institutional/retail, types of products), or relationships (with broker-dealers, custodians, or wirehouses). There’s also added complexity due to the integration required into different custodial platforms, financial planning, or portfolio accounting systems. But none of this is rocket science for any vendor focused on making RIAs successful.

That’s the heart of the problem — most CRM providers or consultants are focused on selling to RIAs, not necessarily focused on RIA success. Their interests are not fully aligned with interests of the wealth management customers they serve.

Let's take the CRM providers. A majority of them serving this market are legacy on-premises software providers who collect the big checks for their software upfront, after which they have little incentive to worry about customer adoption issues. Over the years, these CRM providers have talked customers into believing that their success (or adoption) is somewhat unrelated to the software manufacturers and best addressed by consultants. RIAs pay for the software and the CRM provider is off the hook. Enter the systems integrator, who is tasked with understanding the customer's business and then mapping it to the CRM software. The RIA staff and the consultant work together, hoping to build a Rolls Royce, but often end up with a Yugo. Worse, many continue to throw additional money at the problem.

Recently, a few of the legacy providers have started selling cloud-based CRM. However, focusing on customer success is not in their DNA and they continue to operate like on-premises vendors, outsourcing customer success to others.

Then there are the big cloud providers like Salesforce, Microsoft (Dynamics), and SugarCRM. The challenge is that they are horizontal cloud providers -- they approach every industry with a one-size-fits-all solution. Their focus is too broad to address any RIA-specific issues. The onus for success is passed back to the RIA, paired with a consultant.

But what about consultants? Aren't they supposed to be focused on making RIAs successful?

In reality, most of the consultants who work with RIAs aren’t really consultants -- they are systems integrators (SIs) who earn money customizing a system and charging clients by the hour. The more time they spend customizing the system, the more money they make. That means the wider the gap between the RIA's needs and the CRM system, the happier the SI. Now, SIs definitely have their uses. However, they would be the last people interested in an out-of-the-box CRM that fits RIA needs.

In some cases, custodians and independent broker dealers, who are more aligned with advisor success, provide technology that includes CRM. However, custodians and broker-dealers are not in the CRM business, so they are again dependent on CRM providers and consultants to deliver the goods.

So, what is the answer?
There is new breed of vendor that is decidedly different -- the vertical cloud CRM provider. Vertical cloud providers are not systems integrators or services firms, but pureplay SaaS CRM providers. They don’t charge by the hour. They usually offer a monthly-usage, fee-based, pay-as-you-go pricing model. They invest heavily in customer success because their survival depends on how well they serve their customers, which is where their interests are neatly aligned with the RIAs.

For the torture to end, however, the RIAs also own a couple of important action items:

First, recognizing the obvious: that fixing CRM isn’t their mission. They are in the business of money management. It’s the CRM vendor’s job to provide the CRM to support that business. If the CRM doesn’t work, and the vendor isn’t motivated to solve their CRM issues without getting the RIA to pay, the RIA is dealing with the wrong vendor and needs to find the right vendor.

Second, finding a CRM vendor whose interests are aligned with their own -- a.k.a. a vertical cloud CRM provider. Most CRM vendors nowadays label themselves as cloud providers, making it difficult to separate the real from the fake. Here are some simple qualifying questions: Does the CRM provider also offer an on-premises version of its solution? Does the CRM solution require paying for professional services? If the answer to any of these questions is yes, the RIAs can safely stay away from those vendors, if they want to escape CRM torture.

Alok Misra is a Cofounder & Principal at Navatar Group, the financial services industry cloud provider. A prominent cloud expert, he writes regularly about business aspects of the cloud, for several publications. Alok spent his early career at Deloitte and PwC, before ... View Full Bio
Comment  | 
Print  | 
More Insights
Comments
Threaded  |  Newest First  |  Oldest First
Greg MacSweeney
50%
50%
Greg MacSweeney,
User Rank: Author
7/21/2014 | 6:48:41 AM
Looking for a solution
Since all RIAs operate differently and have different workflows, I imagine it would be hard for any CRM provider to provide a product that could be attractive to more than just a couple of RIAs. How can a CRM provider (either cloud or traditional) offer a product that is flexible enough to meet the needs of a very diverse RIA client base?
More Commentary
Moving the Trader Closer to the Investment Process
The sell side can demonstrate more value by applying analytics to pre- and post-trading, and by educating buy-side clients about broker segmentation, trading behavior and algorithm shortcomings, and more.
Wirehouses May See More Independent BDs as Retention Packages Expire
Retention bonuses are expiring, leaving brokerages vulnerable to attrition. Is access to technology making it easier for brokers to go independent?
SCI: A Whale of a Regulation
The SEC's Reg SCI weights in at a whopping 742 pages. Here is what you need to know about the oversized regulation.
One Size Fits Nobody in End User Services
How building profiles from employees' roles and behaviors can help optimize your end user services.
'Enlightened' Non-IT Execs More Likely To Run Secure Organization
Do senior executives understand their role in data security? On the whole, unsurprisingly, no.
Register for Wall Street & Technology Newsletters
White Papers
Current Issue
Wall Street & Technology - Elite 8, October 2014
The in-depth profiles of this year's Elite 8 honorees focus on leadership, talent recruitment, big data, analytics, mobile, and more.
Video
Top Quotes of the Week
Top Quotes of the Week
It wasn't all bad luck for the capital markets this week: Hedge funds had a decent first quarter despite a slowdown in jobs numbers, BlackRock might be heading into new territory as hedge fund managers take a hard look at their counterparties, and the head of the IMF didn't pull any punches when assessing today's global economy. At least we can admire the nice weather and some of the best quotes of the week.