News & Commentary
News
Commentary
NewsNews
Commentary
CommentaryNews
Commentary
Commentary
Commentary
Commentary
Commentary
CommentaryNewsNews
Commentary
CommentaryNewsNewsNews
Current Conversations
Posted by IvySchmerken
Luke, If 45% of IT respondents globally are admitting that financial institutions have been hit by denial of service (DDoS) attacks, the figure could be higher. It clearly demonstrates that cybersecurity should not...
In reply to: Re: The stakes are too high for cyber security to be pushed to the bottom of the pile.
Post Your Own Reply
Luke, If 45% of IT respondents globally are admitting that financial institutions have been hit by denial of service (DDoS) attacks, the figure could be higher. It clearly demonstrates that cybersecurity should not...
In reply to: Re: The stakes are too high for cyber security to be pushed to the bottom of the pile.Post Your Own Reply
Posted by Greg MacSweeney
Yes, a multi-pronged approach is needed. Hopefully, the industry can move fast enough and get up to speed to counter these growing and changing threats. After all, an attack that disrupts the markets will do little to help...
In reply to: Re: Most alarming
Post Your Own Reply
Yes, a multi-pronged approach is needed. Hopefully, the industry can move fast enough and get up to speed to counter these growing and changing threats. After all, an attack that disrupts the markets will do little to help...
In reply to: Re: Most alarmingPost Your Own Reply
Posted by IvySchmerken
I agree. Any cybersecurity breach is serious since most brokers are networked to exchanges, ATSs, clearing firms and depositories, so malevolent code can travel. Regulators are looking at creating policies that can be implemented...
In reply to: Re: Most alarming
Post Your Own Reply
I agree. Any cybersecurity breach is serious since most brokers are networked to exchanges, ATSs, clearing firms and depositories, so malevolent code can travel. Regulators are looking at creating policies that can be implemented...
In reply to: Re: Most alarmingPost Your Own Reply
Posted by Greg MacSweeney
Wow. It didn't take long for #2 to start to come true. Let's see how it plays out.With your prognostication abilities, have you considered starting a side business? People will pay a lot to "know" what will happen in the...
In reply to: Re: Could this be #2 coming true? Scandal in the Metals Market...
Post Your Own Reply
Wow. It didn't take long for #2 to start to come true. Let's see how it plays out.With your prognostication abilities, have you considered starting a side business? People will pay a lot to "know" what will happen in the...
In reply to: Re: Could this be #2 coming true? Scandal in the Metals Market...Post Your Own Reply
Posted by DrJohnBates
See today's article on BBC - potential scandal brewing in the silver market?
http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/business-28509979
In reply to: Could this be #2 coming true? Scandal in the Metals Market...
Post Your Own Reply
See today's article on BBC - potential scandal brewing in the silver market?
http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/business-28509979
In reply to: Could this be #2 coming true? Scandal in the Metals Market...Post Your Own Reply
Posted by IvySchmerken
Going back to John's predictions for ATS consolidation, I think we will see more regulation of dark pools in the way they report to institutional investors. Already there is more transparency from the FINRA data reporting...
In reply to: Re: I'm not sure number one needs to be a terrorist
Post Your Own Reply
Going back to John's predictions for ATS consolidation, I think we will see more regulation of dark pools in the way they report to institutional investors. Already there is more transparency from the FINRA data reporting...
In reply to: Re: I'm not sure number one needs to be a terroristPost Your Own Reply
Posted by IvySchmerken
False advertising and marketing would not be tolerated in other industries.
In reply to: Re: I'm not sure number one needs to be a terrorist
Post Your Own Reply
False advertising and marketing would not be tolerated in other industries.
In reply to: Re: I'm not sure number one needs to be a terroristPost Your Own Reply
Posted by Greg MacSweeney
Could you imagine Ford falsely stating in a marketing brochure that the Ford Explorer gets 90 miles per gallon (highway)? And then, when the state AGs fine Ford for false advertising, could you imagine Ford's defense being...
In reply to: Re: I'm not sure number one needs to be a terrorist
Post Your Own Reply
Could you imagine Ford falsely stating in a marketing brochure that the Ford Explorer gets 90 miles per gallon (highway)? And then, when the state AGs fine Ford for false advertising, could you imagine Ford's defense being...
In reply to: Re: I'm not sure number one needs to be a terroristPost Your Own Reply
Posted by IvySchmerken
Yes, Barclay's 'motion' is full of legal parsing of words. It's basically saying that sophisticated traders and asset managers should know better than to trust its marketing materials. Essentially the buy side is on its...
In reply to: Re: I'm not sure number one needs to be a terrorist
Post Your Own Reply
Yes, Barclay's 'motion' is full of legal parsing of words. It's basically saying that sophisticated traders and asset managers should know better than to trust its marketing materials. Essentially the buy side is on its...
In reply to: Re: I'm not sure number one needs to be a terroristPost Your Own Reply
Posted by HandicapperBill
I love when people who've either never been a mainframer or haven't worked with the mainframe for years, feels the need to tell everyone how ancient the technology is. It shows either a bias or a lack of knowledge. The mainframe...
In reply to: Mainframe as old technology!
Post Your Own Reply
I love when people who've either never been a mainframer or haven't worked with the mainframe for years, feels the need to tell everyone how ancient the technology is. It shows either a bias or a lack of knowledge. The mainframe...
In reply to: Mainframe as old technology!Post Your Own Reply
Posted by Greg MacSweeney
One of the reasons why regulators are looking closely at the security at financial firms is because they are worried about more than a simple breach at one bank. A breach at one firm is bad, but if that breach can cascade...
In reply to: Most alarming
Post Your Own Reply
One of the reasons why regulators are looking closely at the security at financial firms is because they are worried about more than a simple breach at one bank. A breach at one firm is bad, but if that breach can cascade...
In reply to: Most alarmingPost Your Own Reply
Posted by Greg MacSweeney
Barclays doesn't seem to be doing itself any favors. Now it is fighting back on the lawsuit, claiming that investors knew that their glossy marketing wasn't true. So, Barclays is basically saying that it knew the marketing...
In reply to: Re: I'm not sure number one needs to be a terrorist
Post Your Own Reply
Barclays doesn't seem to be doing itself any favors. Now it is fighting back on the lawsuit, claiming that investors knew that their glossy marketing wasn't true. So, Barclays is basically saying that it knew the marketing...
In reply to: Re: I'm not sure number one needs to be a terroristPost Your Own Reply
PR Newswire
Wall Street & Technology - July 2014In addition to regular audits, the SEC will start to scrutinize the cyber-security preparedness of market participants.
Exclusive: Inside the GETCO Execution Services Trading Floor
Advanced Trading takes you on an exclusive tour of the New York trading floor of GETCO Execution Services, the solutions arm of GETCO.
Stressed Out by Compliance, Reputational Damage & Fines?
Financial services executives are living in a "regulatory pressure cooker." Here's how executives are preparing for the new compliance requirements.
- Featured UBM Tech Sites
- InformationWeek |
- Network Computing |
- Dr. Dobbs |
- Dark Reading
- Our Markets:
- Business Technology |
- Electronics |
- Game & App Development
- Working With Us:
- Advertising Contacts |
- Event Calendar |
- Tech Marketing Solutions |
- Corporate Site |
- Contact Us / Feedback
Tweet This